TEST PLEASE: if_tun patch
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Sun Sep 28 22:29:10 PDT 2003
In message <20030929050442.GA20995 at Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>, Brooks Davis writes:
>> | Properly dismantle and remove the interface and destroy the dev_t=20
>> | at last close of the device.
>
>I'm not convinced this is the right direction to move in. The problem
>is that users are beginning to expect that pseudo-interfaces be created
>with network interface cloning, but tun, tap, and vmnet aren't.
I'm totally "don't-care" on the semantics of any and all of these,
my patch is just an attempt to evict makedev() from the tree. If you
have a better idea how to do this, by all means go for it.
It has also been pointed out that my subsequent if_tap.c patch would
likely break the way people expect the "vmnet" device to work so I
have already canned that.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list