ports and -current
Daniel Eischen
eischen at vigrid.com
Sat Sep 20 17:43:29 PDT 2003
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <3F6BF02F.9040707 at schmalzbauer.de>
> Harald Schmalzbauer <h at schmalzbauer.de> writes:
> : Not only the -pthread removement broke countless ports (some of them are
>
> Maybe I missed the reason why FreeBSD needs to be unique wrt threading
> programs and not have -pthread...
Because -pthread allows selection of one specific threadling library,
not multiple. It is also unnecessary since the library is specified
as a link option, not a compiler option. In the future, -pthread
will be a NOOP, but it suits us now to have it cause an error so
that ports that don't honor PTHREAD_LIBS can be found and fixed.
--
Dan Eischen
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list