ports and -current

Daniel Eischen eischen at vigrid.com
Sat Sep 20 17:43:29 PDT 2003


On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <3F6BF02F.9040707 at schmalzbauer.de>
>             Harald Schmalzbauer <h at schmalzbauer.de> writes:
> : Not only the -pthread removement broke countless ports (some of them are 
> 
> Maybe I missed the reason why FreeBSD needs to be unique wrt threading
> programs and not have -pthread...

Because -pthread allows selection of one specific threadling library,
not multiple.  It is also unnecessary since the library is specified
as a link option, not a compiler option.  In the future, -pthread
will be a NOOP, but it suits us now to have it cause an error so
that ports that don't honor PTHREAD_LIBS can be found and fixed.

-- 
Dan Eischen



More information about the freebsd-current mailing list