[security-advisories@freebsd.org: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:17.procfs]

[Barney Wolff]

On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 06:54:04PM -0700, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:45:27PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> > I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain
> > the equivalent revs for -head?  Surely I can't be the only person
> > following -current who doesn't build every day.
> 
> Simply because the SO does not support -CURRENT.

Does this mean that the situation can ever arise where a security bug
is corrected in the advisory's announced releases but not in -current?
Or, can we assume that as of the time of the security announcement
the vulnerability has *always* been corrected in -current?
Thanks,
Barney

-- 
Barney Wolff         http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.