user:sys time ratio

Jeff Roberson jroberson at chesapeake.net
Sun Nov 30 15:54:51 PST 2003


On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Colin Percival wrote:

>    Robert Watson suggested that I compare performance from UP and SMP kernels:
>
> # /usr/bin/time -hl sh -c 'make -s buildworld 2>&1' > /dev/null
>                    Real          User        Sys
>    UP kernel       38m33.29s     27m10.09s   10m59.15s
>       (retest)     38m33.18s     27m04.40s   11m05.73s
>    SMP w/o HTT     41m01.54s     27m10.27s   13m29.82s
>       (retest)     39m47.50s     27m08.05s   12m12.20s
>    SMP w/HTT       42m17.16s     28m12.82s   14m04.93s
>       (retest)     44m09.61s     28m15.31s   15m44.86s
>
>    That enabling HTT degrades performance is not surprising, since I'm not
> passing the -j option to make; but a 5% performance delta between UP and
> SMP kernels is rather surprising (to me, at least), and the fact that the
> system time varies so much on the SMP kernel also seems peculiar.

So you have enabled SMP on a system with one physical core and two logical
cores?  Looks like almost a 20% slowdown in system time with the SMP
kernel.  It's too bad it's enabled by default now.  I suspect that some of
this is due to using the lock prefix on P4 cores.  It makes the cost of a
mutex over 300 cycles vs 50.  It might be interesting to do an experiment
without HTT, but with SMP enabled and the lock prefix commented out.

I have a set of changes for ULE that should fix some of the HTT slowdown,
although it is inevitable that there will always be some.  If you would
like to try the patch, it's available at:

http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/ulehtt.diff

Cheers,
Jeff

>    Is this normal?
>
> Colin Percival
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>



More information about the freebsd-current mailing list