dfr at nlsystems.com
Fri Nov 28 02:17:03 PST 2003
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 07:59, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:24:23AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> [Darwin pre-binding]
> >presumably applies to other processor architectures. The one thing that
> >turns me off to this scheme is that I'd like it if we could find a way to
> >represent this using solely existing BSD/UNIX kernel primitives (mmap, et
> >al) and userspace, rather than adding special-purpose system calls that
> >complicated various code paths, and that aren't portable.
> Compaq/HP Tru64 supports link-time pre-binding, called "Quickstart".
> To use it, shared libraries are linked to load at mutually exclusive
> addresses and applications are linked assuming the preferred .so load
> addresses. At run-time, the rtld verifies that it can map every
> shared library at its preferred address and that each shared library
> is the same one the application was linked against (using checksums in
> the COFF headers). If all this is true, all the relocations are
> correct and execution starts immediately. If any checks fail, rtld
> falls back to the traditional check-every-symbol-and-relocation
> The benefit is very fast start times - not much more overhead than
> starting a static executable.
This is approximately what happens on Win32 too. When developing DLLs
for windows, I tend to manually pick a load address at link time. This
is messy but it helps load time a lot for large projects.
More information about the freebsd-current