40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

Daniel O'Connor doconnor at gsoft.com.au
Tue Nov 25 19:05:27 PST 2003

On Wednesday 26 November 2003 13:25, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:07:55PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than
> > previous versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed.
> Uh... you must not know what you are talking about.  GCC *COMPILES*
> slower as it does a better job of optimizing (which adds time to the
> compiling time).  The produced optimzied binaries have quicker
> *RUN-TIME*s.

I'm talking about compile time.

> Why would any one want to call for a compiler to be removed that produces
> faster binaries??

Ahh, why indeed..

Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140  AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list