Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything

[Tim Kientzle]

Stijn Hoop wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:27:55PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>Maybe it's time to separate these two functions?
>>I would be content to have a static /sbin/sh
>>that is used as the system script interpreter for
>>rc scripts, etc.
> 
> 
> And /usr/bin/sh as a user shell?

I was thinking /bin/sh for the user shell
and /sbin/sh for the system script
interpreter.

There must be a /bin/sh and given that
there are many user scripts that rely on
it, it seems that it must be a user
shell.

Tim Kientzle