Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything
Dan Nelson
dnelson at allantgroup.com
Wed Nov 19 18:20:25 PST 2003
In the last episode (Nov 19), Richard Coleman said:
> I don't really care whether everything is statically or dynamically
> linked. With the fast machines and huge disks these days, bloat is not
> much of an issue. But nss and pam need to work correctly. If the folks
> that are against dynamic linking have an alternate method to make this
> work, I'm all for it. But it needs to be more than theory. We need code.
>
> To be honest, I've never understood the (seemingly irrational)
> resistance against this change. Solaris made this change 10 years ago.
Not completely:
$ uname -a
SunOS pd1 5.9 Generic_112233-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise
$ file /bin/sh
/sbin/sh: ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1, statically linked, stripped
$ file /sbin/* | grep statically | cut -d: -f1 | fmt
/sbin/autopush /sbin/fdisk /sbin/jsh /sbin/mount /sbin/sh
/sbin/soconfig /sbin/sync /sbin/umount /sbin/uname
--
Dan Nelson
dnelson at allantgroup.com
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list