Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything
gni at gecko.de
Wed Nov 19 01:47:27 PST 2003
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:26:21PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Our rationale for encouraging Gordon is as follows:
> :1. 4.x upgrade path: As we approach 5-STABLE, a lot of users might want
> : to upgrade from 4-STABLE. Historically in 4.x, the / partition has
> : been very modest in size. One just simply cannot cram the bloat that
> : has grown in 5.x into a 4.x partition scheme. Of course there is the
> : venerable 'dump - clean install - restore' scheme, but we were looking
> : for something a little more user-friendly.
> This argument would apply to very old 4.x users but not to anyone who
> installed it as of March 2001. I bumped the nominal size of the
> root partition to 128MB in 188.8.131.52 of sysinstall/label.c.
Don't you think that people are able to change defaults if they think
> Prior to that Jordan had bumped the root partition size to 100MB
> in 184.108.40.206 in March 2001. It was 50MB before then, which is too
> small even for 4.x.
Hm, then why do I have still room on my 50MB root partition?
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/vinum/root 49583 29040 16577 64% /
Thats enough for installworld (if softupdates are turned off)
More information about the freebsd-current