Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything
Garance A Drosihn
drosih at rpi.edu
Tue Nov 18 17:20:13 PST 2003
At 6:42 PM -0600 11/18/03, masta wrote:
>
>Besides, I see nothing preventing anybody from building
>their system with static worlds,
true...
>and there is nothing stopping anybody from putting /rescue
>in the PATH before /bin or /sbin.
Note that this will not have the same performance as the
older all-static setup, because each binary in /rescue
is a crunchgen'ed combination of *all* the commands there.
They're all hardlinked together. Eg:
(332) # ls -l /bin/cp /rescue/cp
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 113372 Nov 16 02:29 /bin/cp*
-r-xr-xr-x 131 root wheel 3807836 Nov 16 02:30 /rescue/cp*
I have no idea what kind of a difference that would make,
I'm just saying that it is different... :-)
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih at rpi.edu
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list