HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked
Peter Wemm
peter at wemm.org
Mon Nov 17 20:27:37 PST 2003
Ken Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:59:47PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> > It is 'system' binaries. The distinction between bin and sbin (and /usr/
> > bin and /usr/sbin) is that the binaries in */sbin are only really supposed
> > to be useful for administrators or other priviliged users.
>
> Yup, this distinction was in place long before shared libraries came
> along but not in its current form. You can only consider yourself a
> true UNIX dinosaur if at some point you changed your path to replace
> "/usr/etc /etc" with "/usr/sbin /sbin". /etc was where they lived
> at first.
*Everbody* knows that ifconfig belongs in /etc/ifconfig :-)
On my SVR4 system (past life), /bin was a symlink to /usr/bin and /sbin
was a symlink to /usr/sbin. /usr was on /. Things were simpler.
I say we ditch this silly /usr thing and put it all in /bin + /lib and be
done with it. :-)
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter at wemm.org; peter at FreeBSD.org; peter at yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list