init and USB oddities-ULE-ATA

Harald Schmalzbauer h at schmalzbauer.de
Sun Nov 16 21:26:44 PST 2003


On Monday 17 November 2003 06:08, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:41:04AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
*SNIP*
> I can assure you that the numerical simulations I run, along with
> the "make worlds", and compilations of gcc's tree-ssa branch
> stress the system.  I re-install over 100 ports today and the
> load average was rarely below 5.  I was use linux-opera and
> knews and sylpheed and several other program and noticed
> nor degradation in responsiveness.  Does seti cause a problem
> if you are not running X (or KDE).

That reflects my opinion that this awful interactivity only occurs if 
ATA-disk-access is involved!

Sorry for this second replay. I'm in hurry while I don't know why ?!@!

-Harry

>
> > I haven't claimed ULE to be unstable though. I just wanted to highlight
> > some issues which will be a big problem if 5.2-releas will have ULE as
> > default!
>
> If ULE is destined to be the default scheduler in 5-stable, then
> we need to have more people test it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20031117/3acb810b/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list