HEADS-UP new statfs structure
Andrew Gallatin
gallatin at cs.duke.edu
Fri Nov 14 14:13:37 PST 2003
Daniel Eischen writes:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> >
> > Kirk McKusick writes:
> > > >
> > > > And mail/postfix and devel/gnomevfs2 (ones's i've found so far)
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > > This is why we make this change now so that it will be in place
> > > for the masses when 5.2 is released :-)
> >
> > Can't we bump the libc version so that dynamically linked, non-system
> > binaries can continue to work? Having things like postfix and gnome
> > dumping core seems excessivly bumpy. Upgrading all ports is a pain.
>
> I don't think that's a good idea. I've also got changes in
> mind that require a libc version bump, but they aren't ready
> now. I was saving them for 6.0. Other folks may also have
> similar changes in mind. Do we really want to have yet another
> version bump?
It costs ~1MB in disk space for each libc bump, yes that's expensive.
But so is having many random, non-system applications bomb after you
upgrade. Shooting all early adopters in the head is really bad for
PR. I think that 1MB of disk space is worth it.
> For 6.0, can we start off libc at libc.so.YYYYMMDD and move it
Yes! Yes!
Drew
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list