ULE and very bad responsiveness

[Jeff Roberson]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:

> On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:
> >
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer <news at schmalzbauer.de> wrote:
> > >> Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case it's not neccessary
> > >> at all. I built a UP kernel with ULE like Kris advised me.
> > >
> > > Are you running an up-to-date 5.1-CURRENT?  ULE was broken with these
> > > characteristics until very recently.  If you're up-to-date and still
> > > see these problems, you need to post to the current mailing list.
> > >
> > > Kris
> >
> > Yes, I am running current as of 13. Nov.
> >
> > Find attached my first problem description.
>
> This time I also attached my dmesg and kernel conf

Try running seti with nice +20 rather than 15.  Do you experience bad
interactivity without seti running?

Thanks,
Jeff

>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Harry
>