5.2-RELEASE TODO
Tim Robbins
tjr at FreeBSD.ORG
Thu May 29 07:20:27 PDT 2003
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:00:13AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> |---------------------+----------+-----------------+---------------------|
> | | | | Almost all process |
> | | | | debugging tools |
> | | | | have been updated |
> | | | | to use non-procfs |
> | | | | kernel primitives, |
> | | | | with the exception |
> | | | | of truss(1). As |
> | | | | procfs is |
> | | | | considered |
> | | | | deprecated due to |
> | truss support for | In | | its inherent |
> | ptrace | progress | Robert Drehmel | security risks, it |
> | | | | is highly desirable |
> | | | | to update truss to |
> | | | | operate in a |
> | | | | post-procfs world. |
> | | | | Dag-Erling Smorgrav |
> | | | | had prototype |
> | | | | patches; |
> | | | | Robert Drehmel is |
> | | | | developing and |
> | | | | testing patches |
> | | | | now. |
> |---------------------+----------+-----------------+---------------------|
gcore also uses procfs. Converting it to use something else (libkvm or perhaps
ptrace) won't be straightforward.
Tim
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list