5.1 beta2 still in trouble with pam_ldap

[Dag-Erling Smorgrav]

Ruslan Ermilov <ru at freebsd.org> writes:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:45:44AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Gordon Tetlow <gordont at gnf.org> writes:
> > > I'm unfamiliar with ["binding"]. What's it do?
> > It behaves like "sufficient" should, i.e. failure is not ignored.
> You mean, _last_ failure is not ignored?

I don't understand the question.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des at ofug.org