gcc/libm floating-point bug?

[Morten Rodal]

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 06:10:14PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> Honest question of you -- I'll assume you're subscribed to
> freebsd-current at .  How have you missed all the warnings from myself and
> others not to trust the -march=pentium4 optimizations?  I honestly want
> to know so we can figure out a better way of getting the word out.
> 

I am not going to discuss the removal of the -march=pentium4, but a
warning would be nice.  Either in the form of the release notes or in
the make.conf, preferrable both.

As for the "missed all warnings [...]" I think this just proves that
it is necessary to document things like this.  Also see the post about
a lot of new people trying out 5.0 for the first time and the troubles
they are having with getting help.  Search for

 Message-ID: <006d01c30f6c$3feb3690$6601a8c0 at VAIO650>

posted in late April.
         
-- 
Morten Rodal

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20030522/80d49745/attachment.bin