Floppy Support
The Anarcat
anarcat at anarcat.ath.cx
Sat May 3 16:59:15 PDT 2003
On Sun May 04, 2003 at 09:29:36AM +1000, Duraid Madina wrote:
> Are you saying that you would be honestly upset or at a serious
> disadvantage if 4.8/5.0-rel were the latest releases you could install
> from floppies and that if you wanted a more recent FreeBSD on your 1996
> hardware, you'd have to install 4.8 or 5 first and upgrade your way up?
I know I would be upset.
Why does everyone keep on trying to ditch the old hardware? It still
works, doesn't it? It's still useful, isn't it?
So what if it it's pre-'95? Are we so "hip" that we need to drop support
for everything older that 7 years?
I despise the habit of the computer industry of deprecating perfectly
valid hardware in order to make sales.
We don't have to follow such trends.
I think you are mixing two problems: the CDROM boot and the FLOPPY boot.
Those can be 2 totally different issues if we need to. Fix the CDROM
boot to allow fatty kernels for your exotic hardware. But don't break
the floppy boot, a lot of less fortunate folks need it.
Not everyone can afford fresh new hardware.
A.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20030503/4c698560/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list