VIA C3
GerritKühn
gerrit at pmp.uni-hannover.de
Wed Jun 18 08:20:14 PDT 2003
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:10:49AM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote:
> > Well, all I can say is, that I bought it as "Ezra" and there is "Ezra"
> > printed on it. FreeBSD identifies it as Samuel2, though.
> And I bought my Ezra as a Nehemiah.
[...]
> So maybe they do have a way to distinguish the chips. Dunno -- at the very
> least, it's not marketed. And the Samuel2 is definitely not an Ezra.
Thanks for the clarification. I'm almost sure that there was something
with "ezra" printed right on the cpu, but I can't remember for sure;
so maybe you're right with the assumption that it's in fact a Samuel2.
> FWIW, the best way I've seen to figure out which chip you're using (at least
> between Ezra/Ezra-T and Nehemiah) is to look at the clocking -- Ezra/Ezra-T
> seems to be 100*10.0, whereas Nehemiah seems to be 133*7.5.
Back to the performance-discussion between cputype 586/mmx and k6-3
optimization: do you have a suggestion how to benchmark it?
cu
Gerrit
--
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list