Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

[David O'Brien]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:51:28PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:44:27 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:40:53PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > > After installing libc.so builded with standard bsd.sys.mk (i.e. with 
> > > gnu99) all shared programs reports missing 'SYS_sigreturn' name and fails 
> > > to start.
> > > 
> > > When I restore old libc and rebuild libc without gnu99, all works fine
> > > again.
> > 
> > Please provide sufficent detail that I can track down your problem.
> 
> The problem itself is gone with updating to new bsd.sys.mk where now
> CSTD            ?=      c99
> for i386, but some time ago there was
> CSTD            ?=      gnu99
> for i386 and I just build/install libc to trigger the bug.

This isn't a bug report.  The mail server I am writing this from, and the
laptop I am using to log into it from; are running with a stock world and
I can't repeat your problem.