[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

[Dag-ErlingSmørgrav]

Peter Wemm <peter at wemm.org> writes:
> Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, and
> is rather consistent.

"told you so"

> So, who has been messing with make(1) lately?

I believe that the problem is in the kernel, not in make(1); it just
happens to be triggered by make(1) because it is a big (if not the
biggest) vfork(2) consumer.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no