An experiment: 64-bit time_t on IA-32 (5.2-RC)
Garance A Drosihn
drosih at rpi.edu
Mon Dec 22 11:16:48 PST 2003
At 7:01 PM +1100 12/22/03, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 21, 2003, Craig Boston wrote:
> > The initial compile went off without a hitch. This is no
> > doubt due to hard work by the people working on the ia64,
> > amd64, etc. ports where time_t is 64-bits by default. A
> > side note, I noticed that the alpha and sparc64 ports
> > seem to be using 32-bit time_t, which surprised me.
>
>Alpha has a 32-bit time_t for compatability with Tru64. There
>are occasional discussions on -alpha regarding the pros and
>cons of moving to 64-bits. I suspect SPARC is 32 bit for
>Solaris compatability.
Note that there it is likely we will switch sparc64 to a
64-bit time_t before 5.3 is released. We talked about making
that change sometime in January, once we would be sure that
5.2-release was settled.
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih at rpi.edu
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list