5.2: will standard-supfile point to RELENG_5_2?

[John Baldwin]

On 08-Dec-2003 Colin Percival wrote:
> At 12:29 08/12/2003 -0800, Doug White wrote:
>>Doubtful -- standard-supfile is for grabbing -current.  If you want a
>>specific tag, you need to specify it. I just copy the same cvsupfile
>>around to different machines as I build them so I don't forget :)
> 
>    RELENG_x_y's standard-supfile has tracked RELENG_x_y for every release 
> branch so far except for x=5,y=1.

Yes, that seems sensible.  If we were going to have a permament
current supfile, current-supfile would be a better name for that
type of file.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/