40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh
Daniel C. Sobral
dcs at tcoip.com.br
Tue Dec 2 12:06:08 PST 2003
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> Why didn't you pipe up when this was discussed _long_ ago?
> I don't understand why you can't buildworld with static slash if you feel so
> strongly about it.
As for that, it was discussed on arch@, not current at . And _I_,
personally, got the impression the plan was to make dynamic world an
_option_, not the default.
Now, my machines usually get by themselves, but all *I* do on them is
sh(1) intensive, so I'll probably be using the static root option when
it comes time to upgrade them to 5.x.
> If you are deploying FreeBSD on servers you should build your own release
> anyway (which is hardly an onerous task).
And if you are using FreeBSD on desktop you should use bash or some
other ports-shell, instead of slowing down _the_ shell for shell
scripts. But that's IMHO, so I didn't pipe this in until now. But it's
the very same argument you are making, so I thought you deserved to hear it.
--
Daniel C. Sobral
Gerência de Operações
Divisão de Comunicação de Dados
Coordenação de Segurança
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo at tco.net.br
Daniel.Sobral at tcoip.com.br
dcs at tcoip.com.br
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list