panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex
M. Warner Losh
imp at bsdimp.com
Mon Apr 28 16:39:33 PDT 2003
In message: <200304282255.h3SMtuPi008021 at mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net>
Jeffrey Hsu <hsu at FreeBSD.org> writes:
: > Set a flag in your driver before you drop the wi lock that the
: > wiintr() function can check and bail out immediately if it is set.
: > For example:
:
: > foo_detach()
: > {
: > ...
: > sc->sc_dead = 1;
: > FOO_UNLOCK(sc); <--- Race 1
: > bus_teardown_intr(...)
We can't get an interrupt after this returns, and we're guaranteed
that the interrupt has terminated.
: > ...
: mtx_destroy(&sc->sc_mtx); <--- note this
: > }
:
: > foo_intr()
: > {
: > FOO_LOCK(sc);
: > if (sc->sc_dead) {
: > FOO_UNLOCK(sc);
: > return;
: > }
: > ...
: > }
:
: The sc_dead flag doesn't protect against foo_intr() attempting to
: lock a mutex that has been destroyed. fxp has the same problem
: and is one of the reasons, among others, I wasn't too happy with
: the fxp softc locks introduced there.
Since this race isn't possible, the dead solution is sufficient to
guard against the Race 1 above.
: The solution I have in mind involves using the DEAD flag in the interrupt
: handler to defer destroying the mutex if the interrupt handler is active.
bus_teardown_inter already assures that.
Warner
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list