HEADS UP: new NSS
John Polstra
jdp at polstra.com
Thu Apr 17 12:44:05 PDT 2003
In article <20030418014500.B94094 at iclub.nsu.ru>,
Max Khon <fjoe at iclub.nsu.ru> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:35:14AM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
>
> > You might want to look at how libpam handles this situation. In the
> > static case, all of the known modules are linked into it statically.
> > Then they are located and registered at runtime by means of a linker
> > set.
>
> statically linking pam_ldap to /bin/ls will be a nightmare :)
True, but why would /bin/ls need anything from PAM at all? It
doesn't currently use PAM.
> we need either allow dlopen(3) to be used in statically linked programs
> or move to dynamically linked /.
Moving to a fully dynamically linked system sounds easier to me.
But in the past there has been strong opposition to the idea every
time it has been proposed.
John
--
John Polstra
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA
"Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list