Public Access to Perforce?
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Wed Aug 18 12:29:08 PDT 2004
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 03:23:04PM -0400, David Rhodus wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:09:24 -0700, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey, it was your silly argument to begin with.
>
> No, I was just following up on someone else's post that wanted the
> perforce development work to be available for public download because
> I think that it should too and that anything else would just not be
> the correct thing for fbsd to do. Crescent Anchor is a commercial
> company, not an open source project, though there are several
> employees that work there which develop on open source projects as
> their full time job.
So you'd be happy if we changed the name of the FreeBSD perforce repo
to - say - LibreBSD, and charged people for access? This would bring
it in line with the DragonFly/FireFly model.
Of course, this would clearly be a step backwards from the situation
as it exists now with FreeBSD, which again points out how silly (dare
I say hypocritical) your argument is.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/attachments/20040818/0a9e8391/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-chat
mailing list