[Bug 167688] [fusefs] Incorrect signal handling with direct_io

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167688

--- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer <cem at freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Alan Somers from comment #4)
> The signal does not interrupt the read(2).

Hm, isn't that part of the bug?  Signals are supposed to interrupt blocked I/O;
not interrupting explains the symptoms from the description mostly (sleep, then
signal handler, then read returns zero).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.