[Bug 203264] bsnmpd returning incorrect values for ipAdEntNetMask, for example mask of 48.0.0.0
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Tue Sep 22 15:46:36 UTC 2015
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203264
Bug ID: 203264
Summary: bsnmpd returning incorrect values for ipAdEntNetMask,
for example mask of 48.0.0.0
Product: Base System
Version: 10.1-RELEASE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Some People
Priority: ---
Component: bin
Assignee: freebsd-bugs at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: smarouchoc at ussignal.com
We discovered this issue on 5 pfsense firewalls running pfsense 2.2.4(amd64),
based on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p15. I chose the amd64 in the hardware section
above because we are running Intel Xeon CPU's and the verison of pfsense we are
running is the 64-bit load.
All of the pfsense firewalls listed below are virtual, running on Intel CPU's
in the same architecture. This is running on top of ESXi 5.5. All the pfsense
VM's have open-tools installed. One machine did not, but exhibited the same
failures as the ones that did, tools were added and the behavior did not
change. This is not CPU or disk space issue, or hardware, as these are running
across 3 different hosts at the time of this writing.
Here is an correct result of an snmp walk of a pfesense 2.1.5 host, based on
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p16:
snmpwalk -v2c -c <string> <host> IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask
IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask.0.0.0.0 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0
IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask.10.0.8.1 = IpAddress: 255.255.255.255
IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask.10.10.10.100 = IpAddress: 255.255.255.255
IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask.64.141.171.33 = IpAddress: 255.255.255.0
IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask.127.0.0.1 = IpAddress: 255.0.0.0
IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask.172.16.15.185 = IpAddress: 255.255.255.0
We get two different results on 2.2.4 - one that does NOT crash the Zenos SNMP
Interfaces modeler that lead us to test this (but is still incorrect):
snmpwalk -v2c -c <string2> <host2> IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask
IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask.0.0.0.0 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0
And this is one of FOUR pfsense 2.2.4 hosts that DOES crash the Zenos SNMP
Interfaces modeler, probably because the mask returned is invalid:
snmpwalk -v2c -c <string3> <host3> IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask
IP-MIB::ipAdEntNetMask.0.0.0.0 = IpAddress: 48.0.0.0
This is the output of an ifconfig on the host that returns the 48.0.0.0 mask:
$ ifconfig
em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
ether 00:50:56:a3:61:3c
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fea3:613c%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet 64.141.187.132 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 64.141.187.255
nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
status: active
em1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
ether 00:50:56:a3:3e:c3
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fea3:3ec3%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
inet so.me.ip.ad netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast so.me.ip.255 <- edited to remove
private network info
nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
status: active
pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33144
pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500
syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 defer: on
syncok: 1
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
As you can see, there is not a mask resembling 48.0.0.0. This system has 1 CPU
with two cores, 1 Gig of RAM. It has 25 states in the state table at the
moment, mbuf usage is 1270, no swap usage. It's using 12% of the 1 gig of RAM/
4% of the 17 gig disk partition. All interfaces are running at 1000baseT full
duplex.
Config.xml does not contain any reference to an IP or mask of 48.0.0.0.
bsnmpd is configured to ONLY listen on the WAN interface, and we have
restricted who can access that interface to just a single /24 which we control.
This appears to be a bug in bsnmpd. I opened a ticket with pfsense and they
replicated my results on a FreeBSD system running 10.2-STABLE, and told me that
since bsnmp appears to have this issue across versions I needed to open a
problem report with FreeBSD. I have seen a report of similar behaviour in the
pfsense redmine bug tracker from January of 2015, but no one has touched it,
probably because it is an issue in FreeBSD.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list