[Bug 204812] pty read blocks after select, if ^S is written in between
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Wed Nov 25 17:34:27 UTC 2015
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204812
Bug ID: 204812
Summary: pty read blocks after select, if ^S is written in
between
Product: Base System
Version: 10.2-RELEASE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: kern
Assignee: freebsd-bugs at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: cgull at glup.org
The pts driver has an issue with breaking the promise made by select() that a
read will not block, if there is a write of ^S to the pty between the select()
and the read().
The reproduction for this is very simple:
script /dev/null yes
Type ^S.
Type ^Q. Nothing happens, because script is hung on a blocking read. The read
will never complete, because script is hung and your ^Q will never be
delivered.
I originally discovered this while working on mosh (net/mosh), but script
blocks in the same way.
The sequence of events that causes this:
* The pty slave has software flow control enabled.
* select() returns read status for the pty master fd.
* Something write()s ^S to the pty master.
* A read() is started on the pty master, with the expectation that it will not
block. But it does block, and since the tty is stopped, it will never unblock
without outside intervention.
I hesitate to call this a bug, because the state of the pty *is* changed by
that write, and the fix for this issue is not clear. But it violates POLA,
other kernels (Linux, OpenBSD) do not behave this way, and the consequences are
serious.
I see this issue on FreeBSD 10.2, 9.1, and 7.2. An old 4.10 box doesn't have
this issue.
I originally discovered this bug while working on Mosh. It's not a new bug
there. I've now implemented pty packet mode, and the problem exists there too,
even though packet mode should always be able to avoid breaking this promise.
See
https://github.com/mobile-shell/mosh/issues/692
https://github.com/cgull/mosh/tree/pty-packet
I don't understand why nobody has run into this issue before though, either on
the FreeBSD or on the Mosh side. (Mosh has this problem on FreeBSD and OS X.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list