[Bug 197337] rc.d/kdc missing with WITHOUT_KERBEROS, but Kerberos ports need it

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197337

Cy Schubert <cy at FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|New                         |In Progress

--- Comment #2 from Cy Schubert <cy at FreeBSD.org> ---
The question is, should /etc/rc.d/kdc be the correct file or should the krb5
ports use their own file? I could argue it both ways but we should look at
existing and prior precedents such as,

- named (when it was still in base), bind9X ports
- sendmail (in base), sendmail (in ports), postfix, exim, etc...
- ntp (in base), ntp (in ports), and ntp-devel
- there are probably others that don't come to mind right now.

I'd like to keep the approach consistent across all classes of software.

Having said that, I can argue for ${LOCALBASE}/etc/rc.d/kdc if all other ports
do the same or if that is our direction. I think a bigger discussion is needed
to set the standard.

Thoughts?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.