kern/181632: 9.2-RC3 - on resume from suspend, disk operations are slower

[Mike Harding]

The following reply was made to PR kern/181632; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mike Harding <mvharding at gmail.com>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg at freebsd.org>
Cc: bug-followup at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/181632: 9.2-RC3 - on resume from suspend, disk operations
 are slower
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 13:06:40 -0700

 --047d7b624dfe6cf35604e557fe2a
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 I believe that code that put the ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS() in was in this commit:
 
 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c?annotate=122766
 
 The author made a distinction between using ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS() and
 acpi_cpu_c1() in this code, both are used in different parts of the code,
 added with
 the same commit.  If the distinctions are not necessary, I don't know why
 the author
 would make them.
 
 --047d7b624dfe6cf35604e557fe2a
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 <div dir=3D"ltr">I believe that code that put the ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS() in was=
  in this commit:<br><div><br><a href=3D"http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head=
 /sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c?annotate=3D122766">http://svnweb.freebsd.org/bas=
 e/head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c?annotate=3D122766</a><br>
 <br></div><div>The author made a distinction between using ACPI_ENABLE_IRQS=
 () and <br>acpi_cpu_c1() in this code, both are used in different parts of =
 the code, added with<br>the same commit.=A0 If the distinctions are not nec=
 essary, I don't know why the author<br>
 </div><div>would make them.<br></div></div>
 
 --047d7b624dfe6cf35604e557fe2a--