bin/178604: pkg_info -g reports symlinks as missing when ther _are_ there

[Ronald F.Guilmette]

The following reply was made to PR bin/178604; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Ronald F.Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit at freebsd.org
Cc: rfg at tristatelogic.com
Subject: bin/178604: pkg_info -g reports symlinks as missing when ther _are_
 there
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 16:18:16 -0700 (PDT)

 >Number:         178604
 >Category:       bin
 >Synopsis:       pkg_info -g reports symlinks as missing when ther _are_ there
 >Confidential:   no
 >Severity:       non-critical
 >Priority:       low
 >Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
 >State:          open
 >Quarter:        
 >Keywords:       
 >Date-Required:
 >Class:          sw-bug
 >Submitter-Id:   current-users
 >Arrival-Date:   Mon May 13 23:20:01 UTC 2013
 >Closed-Date:
 >Last-Modified:
 >Originator:     Ronald F. Guilmette
 >Release:        FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64
 >Organization:
 entr0py
 >Environment:
 
 System: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64
 
 >Description:
 
 If the "pkg_info -g" command is executed for a package/port whose
 installation included the creation of a symlink pointing to a non-
 existant file, then pkg_info will generate and print a misleading
 and incorrect error message saying that the (symlink) file in question
 "doesn't exist".
 
 This is misleading and incorrect.
 
 >How-To-Repeat:
 
 portsintstall ghostscript9-9.06_1
 pkg_info -g ghostscript9-9.06_1
 
 the result printed will include:
 
 pkg_info: /usr/local/share/ghostscript/9.06/Resource/CIDFont/fonts doesn't exist
 
 >Fix:
 
 Left as an exercise for the reader.
  
 But seriously folks, a proper fix should be fairly trivial.  I will cook
 up patches, if requested.
 >Release-Note:
 >Audit-Trail:
 >Unformatted:
 _______________________________________________
 freebsd-bugs at freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"