bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the same
Allen Landsidel
landsidel.allen at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 17:10:01 UTC 2013
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Allen Landsidel <landsidel.allen at gmail.com>
To: Alexander Motin <mav at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:09:29 -0500
The atacontrol(8) man page and handbook page on RAID (19.4.2) both
discuss (briefly) hardware RAID and say it is supported.
It seems you're calling all the southbridge controllers "software"
RAID? That terminology in my experience is used to describe gmirror/ccd
disks without a RAID controller or RAID BIOS.
In any case, the difference and PR still remain.
A 6 disk RAID-10 controller ((1,2),(3,4),(5,6)) with failed disks 1, & 4
(or even 1,3 & 5) will boot and allow you to do your 'magic.'
A 6 disk RAID0+1 controller ((1,2,3),(4,5,6)) with failed disks 1 & 4
will not boot the OS.
Misrepresenting one as the other in the software is wrong.
On 1/15/2013 11:35, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Please, be my guest to show me where atacontrol(8) controls any hardware
> RAID controller, or anything except ataraid(4) at all.
>
>
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list