kern/176027: flow control systcl consistency for em drivers
Gleb Smirnoff
glebius at FreeBSD.org
Mon Feb 11 13:20:01 UTC 2013
The following reply was made to PR kern/176027; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius at FreeBSD.org>
To: Olivier Cochard-Labbe <olivier at cochard.me>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org, jfv at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/176027: flow control systcl consistency for em drivers
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:10:20 +0400
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:48:51AM +0000, Olivier Cochard-Labbe wrote:
O>
O> >Number: 176027
O> >Category: kern
O> >Synopsis: flow control systcl consistency for em drivers
O> >Confidential: no
O> >Severity: non-critical
O> >Priority: low
O> >Responsible: freebsd-bugs
O> >State: open
O> >Quarter:
O> >Keywords:
O> >Date-Required:
O> >Class: sw-bug
O> >Submitter-Id: current-users
O> >Arrival-Date: Mon Feb 11 11:50:00 UTC 2013
O> >Closed-Date:
O> >Last-Modified:
O> >Originator: Olivier Cochard-Labbe
O> >Release: 9.1-RELEASE
O> >Organization:
O> BSD Router Project
O> >Environment:
O> >Description:
O> On my systems em(4) flow control can be configured with:
O> dev.em.0.fc (if chipset depends of if_em.c)
O> or
O> dev.em.0.flow_control (if chipset depends of if_lem.c)
O>
O> For more consistency (but a POLA?), here is a small patch for if_lem.c that replace 'flow_control' usage by 'fc' usage.
O>
O>
O> >How-To-Repeat:
O>
O> >Fix:
O> Applying the patch.
O>
O> Patch attached with submission follows:
O>
O> --- sys/dev/e1000/if_lem.c.orig 2013-02-11 10:21:00.000000000 +0100
O> +++ sys/dev/e1000/if_lem.c 2013-02-11 10:21:20.000000000 +0100
O> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@
O> #endif
O>
O> /* Sysctl for setting the interface flow control */
O> - lem_set_flow_cntrl(adapter, "flow_control",
O> + lem_set_flow_cntrl(adapter, "fc",
O> "flow control setting",
O> &adapter->fc_setting, lem_fc_setting);
I'd prefer the opposite: substitute for "flow_control" in if_em.c.
Jack, what's your opinion?
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list