kern/159179: [libc] close(2) emitting ECONNRESET is not POSIX
compliant
Michael Gmelin
freebsd at grem.de
Mon Jul 25 18:30:16 UTC 2011
The following reply was made to PR kern/159179; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd at grem.de>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/159179: [libc] close(2) emitting ECONNRESET is not POSIX compliant
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:29:00 +0200
Thinking about this, even the previous behavior (returning EINVAL) was =
not POSIX.1 compliant (at least as far as I understand the standard). =
The author of the patch clearly states that he thinks it is compliant, =
so it would be interesting to see what his perception is based on. It =
would also be good to get a better understanding of why this error is =
emitted in the first place (I got a rough understanding of how the pcb's =
come into play here) and why this seems to happen more frequently now =
(finer grained locking, multithreading etc.). FInally it would be =
interesting to know if this is connected to the rewrites that have taken =
place between 7 and 8. Ultimately I think whatever is going on behind =
the scenes, the high level API calls should be POSIX compliant - =
alternatively the documentation/man pages should clearly state, where =
they're not.
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list