gnu/82484: [patch] for misleading man cvs

[Garrett Cooper]

On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Julian Stacey <jhs at berklix.org> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR gnu/82484; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: "Julian Stacey" <jhs at berklix.org>
> To: "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd at gmail.com>
> Cc: bug-followup at freebsd.org, info-cvs at gnu.org
> Subject: Re: gnu/82484: [patch] for misleading man cvs
> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:35:32 +0200
>
>  Reference:
>  > From:                "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd at gmail.com>
>  > Date:                Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:51:54 -0700
>  > Message-id:  <7d6fde3d0806201951j4f3a85e9r19d119433dff4867 at mail.gmail.com>
>
>  "Garrett Cooper" wrote:
>  > This should be filed as a documentation bug upstream to the CVS folks...
>  > -Garrett
>
>  OK Thanks, who should do that ?
>  Does FreeBSD have cenral liason point to CVS project ?
>  Or should I make contact ? In case, I cc'd info-cvs at gnu.org
>
>  I see /usr/src/contrib/cvs/BUGS -> cvs.texinfo
>  /usr/src/contrib/cvs/doc/cvs.texinfo
>
>  Ref.
>  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=82484
>  http://berklis.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/src/gen/contrib/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/cvs.1.REL=ALL.diff
>
>  Julian

Well, I'm not sure if there's a common point of contact with the cvs
group, but I was just stating what I thought should be done with the
PR :).

Before continuing on though, I think that the most recent copy of cvs
should be checked out and checked to see whether or not the patch that
you previously provided still applies.

-Garrett