kern/37436: [hang] accept dead loop when out of file descriptors
Jin Guojun
jin at george.lbl.gov
Tue Nov 20 20:13:03 PST 2007
Kip Macy wrote:
>On Nov 16, 2007 5:34 PM, Jin Guojun <jin at george.lbl.gov> wrote:
>
>
>>kmacy at FreeBSD.org wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Synopsis: [hang] accept dead loop when out of file descriptors
>>>
>>>State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
>>>State-Changed-By: kmacy
>>>State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 17 01:19:37 UTC 2007
>>>State-Changed-Why:
>>>
>>>Is this still an issue?
>>>
>>>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37436
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I will check into it in a week.
>>
>>
>
>By "still", I mean RELENG_6 or better yet RELENG_7.
>
> -Kip
>
>
Another slightly odd thing is discovered during repeat this test.
The maximum number of threads (pthread_create via libthr) can be created
is 111.
Therefore, there is no way to reproduce this problem due to
pthread_create problem.
The pthread_create() fails due to Error<35> Resource temporarily
unavailable. However,
memory allocation is still functioning. I have tested on a 256MB laptop
and a 1GB desktop,
both had the same problem for pthread creation -- maximum 111 threads
can be created.
Below is my resource limits and I do not believe that is the problem:
/home/users/libthr: limit
cputime unlimited
filesize unlimited
datasize 1048028 kbytes
stacksize 65536 kbytes
coredumpsize unlimited
memoryuse unlimited
vmemoryuse unlimited
descriptors 11095
memorylocked unlimited
maxproc 5547
sbsize unlimited
It looks like 6.2-R and RELENG_6/7 kernel has some restriction on number
of threads to handle,
because all libthr, libpthread and libc_r all behave the same.
Is this true?
So, that only test can be done is to set descriptors limit to 117 on the
server to test 111
connections from a client. Such test is Ok.
If the descriptors limit is set to 116, the accept will return error
without hanging.
But I do not know if this will be true when the number of descriptors
used is larger.
I tried to run the same command multiple times on the same client, it
does not help much.
I will look this issue further.
-Jin
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list