bin/118759: cvs -R doesn't handle non-existent tags

John Hein jhein at timing.com
Sun Dec 16 20:40:04 PST 2007


>Number:         118759
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       cvs -R doesn't handle non-existent tags
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Dec 17 04:40:03 UTC 2007
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     John Hein
>Release:        FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE i386 (and 7.x & -current)
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:

When using -R (or CVSREADONLYFS), cvs update, if invoked with a
non-existent tag, will remove files instead of flagging an error.

>How-To-Repeat:

% env -i /usr/bin/cvs -v

Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.17-FreeBSD (client/server)

Copyright (c) 1989-2004 Brian Berliner, david d `zoo' zuhn, 
                        Jeff Polk, and other authors

CVS may be copied only under the terms of the GNU General Public License,
a copy of which can be found with the CVS distribution kit.

Specify the --help option for further information about CVS

% cd /usr/src/bin/mv

# Without using -R, cvs handles non-existent tags in a reasonable
# way...

% env -i /usr/bin/cvs up -r nonexistenttag; echo status: $?
cvs [update aborted]: no such tag nonexistenttag
status: 1

# If using -R, cvs, instead of flagging an error, removes [unmodified]
# files that don't have the tag.

% env -i /usr/bin/cvs -R up -r nonexistenttag; echo status: $?
cvs update: Updating .
cvs update: Makefile is no longer in the repository
cvs update: mv.1 is no longer in the repository
cvs update: mv.c is no longer in the repository
status: 0


In contrib/cvs/src/tag.c, tag_check_valid() returns early
if readonlyfs is true.  Thus it bypasses the tag checking
that is done without -R.


This isn't horrible since modified files won't be deleted.

But it's not marked as an error, so it's hard to detect if running the
cvs update from a script.  And if the script included tagging of
files, then you will silently miss tagging the files.  That is
just one example of a real problem caused by this bug.


>Fix:

I don't have a patch (presumably for src/tag.c) at the moment, but newer
versions of cvs (such as 1.12.13) include support for -R and don't suffer
from this problem.  I'm wondering if it just might be time to update cvs
in contrib.

Rather than patch the 1.11.17-FreeBSD version, I might just come up
with a patch that's an import of 1.12.13 (unless someone beats me to
it).

Not only does 1.12.13 support -R, but it has some nice new features
that I like, notably the ability to update (or diff, etc.) to a
specified date on a branch (e.g., cvs up -Pd -rFOO-1-2:20071207 or cvs
diff -rFOO-1-2:20050101 -rFOO-1-2:20070801).  Doing so is difficult
with the 1.11.17.

Are there any regression tests I can run that test cvs before
importing a new version to FreeBSD?

[peter@, one-time cvs-meister, cc'd for comment]
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


More information about the freebsd-bugs mailing list