misc/102523: [patch] Virtual serial port server code for
bluetooth/rfcomm_sppd
Dave Eckhardt
davide+freebsd-pr at cs.cmu.edu
Fri Aug 25 23:00:43 UTC 2006
>Number: 102523
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: [patch] Virtual serial port server code for bluetooth/rfcomm_sppd
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Fri Aug 25 23:00:42 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Dave Eckhardt
>Release: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
Carnegie Mellon University
>Environment:
FreeBSD memex 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:32:43 UTC 2006 root at opus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>Description:
While there is already code which enables synchronization
of a PalmOS device over Bluetooth using DUN (dial-up
networking), that seems unnecessarily heavyweight and
harder to secure than the other approach, synchronizing
over an RFCOMM "virtual serial port".
Enclosed please find a patch to rfcomm_sppd which adds
"server mode" code. I have gone back and forth on whether
server mode should contain a loop around the existing
single-transaction code, but figured I'd send in what I
have now and let the maintainer make the policy decision.
I don't have an obvious way to test the (original) client-side
RFCOMM behavior, so it would probably be a good idea to make
sure I haven't broken that, though I tried not to. Also, feel
free to let me know if this approach seems wrong in some way.
>How-To-Repeat:
See directions at http://howto.pilot-link.org/bluesync/ and
ask yourself if it wouldn't be better to skip all the dialup
networking setup on both the Palm device and the host--and
also close that worrisome "-p net:any" door.
>Fix:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~davide/howto/hotsync_bluetooth_serial.html
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list