conf/74004: [PATCH] add fam support to inetd.conf
Jose M Rodriguez
josemi at freebsd.jazztel.es
Sun Feb 20 22:10:15 GMT 2005
The following reply was made to PR conf/74004; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi at freebsd.jazztel.es>
To: =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_K=C3=B6nig?= <bjoern.koenig at alpha-tierchen.de>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: conf/74004: [PATCH] add fam support to inetd.conf
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:04:54 +0100
El Domingo, 20 de Febrero de 2005 22:28, Bj=C3=B6rn K=C3=B6nig escribi=C3=
> Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > with this logic, why we distribute an /etc/inetd.conf? all
> > the entries are commented out.
> It wasn't logic; just an opinion. It's contestable. You didn't
> provide logic either, because you claimed that fam is widely used,
> therefore let's add an default line to inetd.conf. I suppose this is
> much more true as long as we refer to libfam, but this use doesn't
> require inetd. Whatever. I think that adding an appropriate line to
Both gnome and kde uses libfam, but you must have famd running to get=20
this working. And the documented method to run famd is from inetd.
You may easy check that, allthought gnome links with libfam, you really=20
need famd running to get live menu updates.
> inetd.conf won't hurt as much as don't do it, but I agree with you
> that fam is a good candidate for being added to inetd.conf at this
> > And is less error prone uncomment a line that copy and paste
> > while preserve tabs.
> It doesn't matter, because spaces are are valid seperators too.
> Regards Bj=C3=B6rn
More information about the freebsd-bugs