misc/25218: mailwrapper invokes sendmail when resources are
tight
Peter Pentchev
roam at ringlet.net
Thu Jun 3 23:50:25 PDT 2004
The following reply was made to PR misc/25218; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Peter Pentchev <roam at ringlet.net>
To: Peter Wemm <peter at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: misc/25218: mailwrapper invokes sendmail when resources are tight
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 09:41:11 +0300
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:23:55AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Synopsis: mailwrapper invokes sendmail when resources are tight
>=20
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: peter->freebsd-bugs
> Responsible-Changed-By: peter
> Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 29 11:21:09 PST 2004
> Responsible-Changed-Why:=20
> Return neglected PR to the pool. BTW; I strongly object to the
> patches enclosed. Making a last ditch effort is no worse than
> discarding email without trying.
FWIW (as the author of the enclosed patches), with time I've come round
to agree with this point of view. Even if the default MTA does not
actually succeed in delivering the e-mail, there is a good chance that
it will at least attempt to queue it somewhere so that it is at least
available to be rescued later on. Peter (submitter), what do you think?
G'luck,
Peter
--=20
Peter Pentchev roam at ringlet.net roam at sbnd.net roam at FreeBSD.org
PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
What would this sentence be like if pi were 3?
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAwBmG7Ri2jRYZRVMRAmREAJ9NWEPz5jagVw+yLbO33S1eG5g3YQCbBx5e
HBmyAD3cV254fzbmlo/+odM=
=NAli
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list