kern/70881: 5.3 beta1 kernel.generic missing from /boot/kernel/
JJB
Barbish3 at adelphia.net
Mon Aug 23 18:20:27 PDT 2004
The following reply was made to PR kern/70881; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "JJB" <Barbish3 at adelphia.net>
To: "Brooks Davis" <brooks at one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc: "Joe" <fbsd_user at a1poweruser.com>,
<freebsd-gnats-submit at freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: kern/70881: 5.3 beta1 kernel.generic missing from /boot/kernel/
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:11:37 -0400
Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:26:46PM -0400, JJB wrote:
>> Brooks Davis wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:05:10PM +0000, Joe wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Downloaded 5.3 beta1-i386-mininstall.iso, ran md5 checksum and
>>>> count matched, burned to cd and installed using
standard/kern-dev.
>>>> New boot process is missing kernel.generic module in
/boot/kernel
>>>
>>> Why are you expecting one? The kernel on the boot media is
GENERIC
>>> in
>>> 5.3.
>>>
>>> -- Brooks
>>
>> First of all the 5.3 kernel that comes with the iso file has nfs
and
>> core debugging options turned on so it's not a true generic as in
>> what is expected for an stable version based on past stable
version
>> back to 3.0. The 4.x kernel.generic never gets deleted and is
>> always there as built-in safe guard backup if there is problem
with
>> compiling a new kernel. Now I realize that there is a new boot
>> process from 4.x so maybe there needs to be a
/boot/kernel.generic
>> directory that is a copy of /boot/kernel directory the system
>> defaults to boot from. The function of this new directory is much
>> the same as the kernel.generic file in 4.x. It acts as a built-in
>> safe guard so the box can always have something to fall back on
to
>> boot the system so it can be used as platform to fix whatever
caused
>> the original boot problems. The bottom line is 5.3 stable should
>> have the same built-in safe guards as 4.x stable versions have.
This
>> is really a cleanup item for the release built team.
>
> It's not reasionable to expect that 5.x will be identical to 4.x.
In
> this case I don't buy your logic anyway since the reason
> kernel.generic existed before was that the boot media didn't
actually
> use GENERIC (due to space constratints on the floppies) and that
> provided an easy way for users to use GENERIC without a recompile.
> It was never there as a backup kernel. That's job of kernel.old
or
> what ever you you choose to copy working kernels to.
>
> -- Brooks
You better check your facts. All 4.x versions are delivered with
/kernel and /kernel.generic. They both are the same size and /kernel
is the default boot uses. This has nothing to do with floppy
booting. You make no sense and give no reason for not having the
release build team just build a /boot/kernel.generic directory to
continue the same high level of built-in safe guards. The user
community knows it 's there and it must have been important enough
that the 4.x build team put it there in the first place. What makes
you think that it's no longer needed or wanted by the users
community. All indications are the current built team has just over
looked this detail that you are so easily discarding. Isn't the
point of the weekly 5.3 beta build serials to fix these little
oversights on the way to creating 5.3 stable? I don't think you are
with the 5.3 beta testing cycle yet.
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list