libhci update

[Iain Hibbert]

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Iain Hibbert wrote:

> > > Bt_devreq() needs to set/restore a filter too
> >
> > well, maybe. bt_devreq() operates on already opened socket. the
> > assumption i'm making here is that application will set appropriate
> > filter before calling bt_devreq(). otherwise, application would have
> > to always set 'event' field to acceptable value (or zero). i could go
> > either way here. just need to document implemented behavior better.
>
> Mm, its a good point - there are arguments either way (bloat vs guaranteed
> success) but I think since the difference between devreq() and devrecv()
> is that devreq() handles all the fiddly details for you, I think its worth
> doing that aswell..

the bluez hci_send_req() does set the filters btw

iain