Choose between Raspberry Pi 4B 4GB and ROCKPro64
Bernd Walter
ticso at cicely7.cicely.de
Thu Nov 14 13:21:41 UTC 2019
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:47:46AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:24:56 +0100
> Bernd Walter <ticso at cicely7.cicely.de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:09:28PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:53:43AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:52:51PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > > > Bernd Walter wrote this message on Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 23:16 +0100:
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 08:09:38AM -0700, Klaus Küchemann via freebsd-arm wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks like it didn't load the rk3399-rockpro64.dtb, which is on the filesystem
> > > and just tried A64 ones.
> > > The GENERIC kernel on the image seems to know the RK3399 at least.
> >
> > No - those are just overlays.
> > I don't see where it loads the dtb - maybe u-boot gets it from the msdosfs
> > partition before any output, or it is just hidden between the control
> > sequences...
>
> Since you used the pine64 image as a base you probably wrote u-boot
> over the msdos partition so u-boot couldn't load the dtb from there and
> use the embedded dtb. I've never tested with the dtb from u-boot so
> it's might not be really supported.
Oh - u-boot.itb gets written at 8MB and is ~800k long.
Reserved bootcode space on the used image is only 1MB.
Ok - I will repartition and give it another test.
--
B.Walter <bernd at bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.
More information about the freebsd-arm
mailing list