arm support documentation [was: FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE and 11.2-RELEASE images fail to boot on BeagleBone Black]

Russell Haley russ.haley at gmail.com
Wed Jul 17 19:49:52 UTC 2019


On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 8:49 PM Mark Linimon <linimon at lonesome.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 06:34:36PM +0000, Oskar Holmlund wrote:
> > The professional users (Build custom boards based around a SoC and
> > custom FreeBSD images based probably on stable) are interested in which
> > SoC (bcm2837, AM335x, iMX6...), support for SPI (speed/mode), I2C,
> > UART (Yes still using UARTS), GPIO, ADC, PWM, SD/emmc/flash/... USB,
> > some are also interested in LCD (16, 24bit, resolution), Touch interface.
> > If drivers exists for the SoCs watchdog, RTC, DMA and so on.
>
> This is far more work than I can take on at this time.
>
> IMHO a complete table of the form I'm working on is a predicate for
> something like that.  And, complete documentation probably needs to be
> in a database rather than in a text-based table.
>
Might this be a worthy cause for the FreeBSD foundation to pick up? I could
see a number of advantages to a proper database driven page that lists full
support information. It may also spur people or companies to invest a
little time in driver support if there was a clear picture of what is
involved in supporting a platform.

It also seems to me that keeping an Arm driver support list up to date
would require a regular investment. If there was a resource
(person/persons) assigned to the task it would simply be a matter of
contacting the resource when support changes.

Just a thought,
Russ

>
> mcl
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arm at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


More information about the freebsd-arm mailing list