Confirmed update procedure for a self-hosted armv6hf system

[bob prohaska]

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:03:59PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> 
> Most folks should just do whatever they normally do to update, but add
> TARGET_ARCH=armv6 to all make commands when updating an armv6hf system.

Buildworld and buildkernel both worked as advertised, but installworld
failed with

cp -R ${PATH_LOCALE:-"/usr/share/locale"} /tmp/install.b4kWrXan/locale
cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj  MACHINE_ARCH=armv6  MACHINE=arm  CPUTYPE= GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin  GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/groff_font  GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/tmac CC="cc " CXX="c++  "  CPP="cpp "  AS="as" AR="ar" LD="ld" NM=nm  OBJDUMP=objdump OBJCOPY="objcopy"  RANLIB=ranlib STRINGS=  SIZE="size" PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/tmp/install.b4kWrXan  LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/install.b4kWrXan  PATH_LOCALE=/tmp/install.b4kWrXan/locale make -f Makefile.inc1    __MAKE_SHELL=/tmp/install.b4kWrXan/sh reinstall;  MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj  MACHINE_ARCH=armv6  MACHINE=arm  CPUTYPE= GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin  GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/groff_font  GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/tmac CC="cc " CXX="c++  "  CPP="cpp "  AS="as" AR="ar" LD="ld" NM=nm  OBJDUMP=objdump OBJCOPY="objcopy"  RANLIB=ranlib STRINGS=  SIZE="size" PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/tmp/install.b4kWrXan  LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/tmp/install.b4kWrXan  PATH_LOCALE=/tmp/install.b4kWrXan/locale rm -rf /tmp/install.b4kWrXan
sh: cc: not found
make[2]: "/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk" line 142: Unable to determine compiler type for CC=cc .  Consider setting COMPILER_TYPE.
*** [installworld] Error code 1

Up to now no COMPILER_TYPE has been needed.
What's the correct name?

Many thanks for your patience!

bob prohaska