MK_ARM_EABI to retire in current

[Andrew Turner]

On Thu, 22 May 2014 08:07:34 -0600
Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:

> 
> On May 22, 2014, at 3:05 AM, John Hay <jhay at meraka.org.za> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:01:42PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> 
> >> On May 21, 2014, at 1:28 PM, John Hay <jhay at meraka.org.za> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:50:21AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>>> isn't eabi on the xscale still broken?
> >>> 
> >>> It might still be broken. But there are more brokenness than
> >>> that. :-( By defining WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes in src.conf, I can get
> >>> an AVILA kernel built that boots with src from head at around mid
> >>> December. Latest 10 and head just give no output, with or without
> >>> WITHOUT_ARM_EABI defined.
> >> 
> >> Does the same thing happen with make.conf instead of src.conf?
> > 
> > Yes, I have tried both 10 and head with WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes and no
> > output after go in redboot. My compile lines look like this:
> > 
> > make TARGET_ARCH=armeb TARGET_CPUTYPE=xscale toolchain
> > make TARGET=arm TARGET_ARCH=armeb buildkernel KERNCONF=AVILA
> > DESTDIR=/arm/
> > 
> > And then in redboot "load -b 0x200000 kernel" to load it with tftp.
> > And then "go".
> > 
> > The "no output" happened somewhere between mid December and
> > beginning of Feb. I determined that before getting side tracked.
> > I'll see in the next day or two if I can narrow that down.
> > 
> > If someone have patches so that WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes is not needed
> > anymore, I'll test that too.
> 
> This is with gcc, not clang, right?

Clang doesn't support armeb.

Andrew