MK_ARM_EABI to retire in current

[Adrian Chadd]

isn't eabi on the xscale still broken?


-a


On 19 May 2014 08:40, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> MK_ARM_EABI is going to die in current. It is the default for all platforms currently. I’m eliminating it as a build option. It must die because it invisibly (to uname) effects the ABI.
>
> So, to that end, I see two options:
>
> (1) Retire and remove oabi support.
> (2) Retain oabi support, but change its name to armo and armoeb.
>
> The rough consensus of arm developers I’ve polled now, and in the past, is that we just let oabi support die now that EABI support is working for everybody.
>
> Before I pull the trigger on this, however, I must ask if anybody has a problem with my doing option (1), and if so, what keeps you using oabi.
>
> Comments?
>
> Warner
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arm at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"