wandboard-quad: ffec performance (about 190 Mbits/sec)
Boris Samorodov
bsam at passap.ru
Sat May 3 19:58:36 UTC 2014
Hi All,
My home PC has max perfomance approx. 800 Mbit/sec (measured between
two re adapters and a cheap d-link switch in between them).
I've just test ffec performance (one of re's is the other side):
-----
% ifconfig ffec0
ffec0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=80008<VLAN_MTU,LINKSTATE>
ether 00:1f:7b:b4:09:8e
inet 192.168.100.211 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
status: active
nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
% iperf -c 192.168.100.99
Client connecting to 192.168.100.99, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 32.5 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 3] local 192.168.100.211 port 11536 connected with 192.168.100.99
port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 225 MBytes 188 Mbits/sec
-----
Here is the vmstat at the time of iperf test:
-----
% vmstat -w1
procs memory page disks faults cpu
r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr mm0 mm1 in sy cs
us sy id
1 0 0 235M 1934M 219 0 1 0 149 5 0 0 687 685 911
0 2 98
0 0 0 235M 1934M 24 0 0 0 44 9 0 0 246 307 91
1 1 99
0 0 0 235M 1934M 32 0 0 0 44 9 0 0 208 280 94
0 1 99
0 0 0 235M 1934M 29 0 0 0 44 9 0 0 288 373 108
0 0 99
1 0 0 256M 1933M 311 0 0 0 87 9 0 0 8309 757
13373 1 26 73
0 0 0 256M 1933M 12 0 0 0 32 9 0 6 11955 465
20366 0 37 63
0 0 0 256M 1933M 22 0 0 0 44 9 0 0 11379 537
19295 0 34 65
1 0 0 256M 1933M 12 0 0 0 24 9 0 1 11171 461
19067 0 34 65
0 0 0 256M 1933M 12 0 0 0 24 9 0 0 11109 476
18945 1 34 65
1 0 0 256M 1933M 12 0 0 0 24 9 0 0 11354 468
19352 0 36 64
0 0 0 256M 1933M 13 0 0 0 24 9 0 0 11162 465
18866 1 34 65
0 0 0 256M 1933M 12 0 0 0 24 9 0 2 11297 471
19165 0 36 64
1 0 0 256M 1933M 12 0 0 0 24 9 0 0 11345 465
19296 1 35 64
0 0 0 256M 1933M 12 0 0 0 24 9 0 0 11044 461
18634 0 35 65
0 0 0 235M 1934M 65 0 0 0 263 9 0 1 3224 602 5060
2 9 89
0 0 0 235M 1934M 12 0 0 0 24 9 0 0 142 206 77
0 0 100
0 0 0 235M 1934M 34 0 0 0 64 9 0 0 260 347 104
0 1 99
0 0 0 235M 1934M 12 0 0 0 24 9 0 0 142 206 79
0 0 100
-----
Is this an expected result? Assuming that the system was about 65% idle,
there is a space for improvement.
The system:
-----
% uname -a
FreeBSD wandboard 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #6 r265218M: Fri May
2 18:24:07 SAMT 2014
bsam at wandboard:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WANDBOARD-QUAD arm
-----
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
More information about the freebsd-arm
mailing list